Here's Progress shock measures against immigration
Immigration threatens Norwegian culture and Norwegian welfare claims FRP. NRK has seen the internal report where a party selection suggests dramatic measures to fewer asylum seekers to Norway.
- Norway should create and operate reception centers in countries in Africa and Asia.
- Refugees who travel to the country on vacation may lose your residence permit.
- Marriage should not be applied for immigration to Norway.
- Browse Marriage shall be prohibited.
- Immigrants have to work and stay in Norway for ten years before they can get citizenship.
- Only Norwegian citizens are members of the National Insurance Scheme.
- Foreign workers must pay into a "personal social security account" and if the amount paid does not cover any sick leave or finish, migrant workers leave the country.
These are just some of the drastic proposals "Progress Party Sustainability Selection" comes with. The goal is sharp cuts in immigration to Norway.
- Some of these proposals will be quite easy for us to even things out, others will will need some more time to consider, says the Progress Party leader Siv Jensen told NRK.
Internal unrest in Progress
Since April, the Progress Party's sustainability selection worked for shaping the party's new asylum and innvandingspolitikk. The committee was chaired by deputy Per Sandberg and Per-Willy Amundsen. Also Christian Tybring-Pike has been central.
In a 43 pages long report that NRK has had access to drawing sample a grim picture of what could happen with the Norwegian welfare state if immigration continues at the same level as today.
- I am very happy that the contents of this report are available. I guess it does not take long before our opponents start attacking what it says, but we need a debate about Norwegian immigration policy, says Jensen.
But Norwegian knowledge management in FRP basically had decided that the report should not be published in its entirety.Within the party has ruled strong dissatisfaction that management would only present fragments of the contents before the election.
Fearing welfare state will succumb
Jensen stresses to NRK that the FRP has not yet taken a position on the report, but she agrees that "every stone must be turned" to bring down immigration to Norway.
Several of the measures range comes with will involve massive upheaval, not only for Norway but for the entire UN system. The group will include changing the institution of asylum, cancel the current Refugee Convention and challenge the EEA and Schengen cooperation to ensure that Norway will have more control over who and how many people come to the country.
- We need to change the asylum system, and then we need to look into the international pop agreements that govern this, says Jensen.
The report is based on a premise that current immigration is unsustainable.
The Progress Party's base is based on financial newspaper's calculations, which in turn is based on the SSB report on the economic effects of immigration.
"The accounts show that for every R3-immigrant (non-Western, journ.'s Note) who come to Norway, the state assumes an average of a future net cost commitment of 4.1 million," says the committee's report.
Article continues below the video:
The amount of 4.1 million will go over a period of 86 years, which also costs related to children and any grandchildren are counted.
If immigration from non-Western countries continues as today, it would cost the state 3051 billion by 2100, according Progress Report.
SSB warns against wrong connections
Research in Statistics Norway, Erling Holmøy, says to NRK that Progress report on critical issues around how immigration affects the Norwegian economy.
At the request of the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation, he has read the report where FRP comes with a number of figures and tables showing how animals are immigration.
- I can not find a calculation error, but there are differences between it and the use of numbers in the wrong context and have misleading comparisons, he said.
He believes that including this excerpt from the report may be misunderstood:
"To put the cost at 4.1 million in perspective: In 2011 paid each person over 17 years on average £ 95,300 in tax. This means that a typically must pay taxes for 42 years to finance the fiscal cost of one R3-immigrant (non-Western immigrant, journ. Anm). "
Holmøy indicates that the number 4100000 extends over a given period of 86 years. All government expenditure is, including those related to the new immigrants are descendants.
- The calculation of 4.1 million, I go for good. But here is one that is a comparison of the sum goes over 86 years, a sum that runs over 365 days. The fact that the numbers are very different, it should not surprise anyone, he says.
Jensen: - Do not sustainable
Siv Jensen is no doubt that the cost of the welfare state in danger.
- It is not sustainable. Therefore, we initiated a project to look at how we can tighten Norwegian politics, she says.
Now, there are about 16,000 non-western immigrants to Norway every year. Several places in the report that NRK has gained access to operating range with a desired reduction to between 1,500 and 5,000 new immigrants a year.
- Progress has long said that we need a stop to immigration to Norway. Exactly what level we end on, I can not say now, but it's no secret that FRP go in for drastic cuts in immigration, says Jensen.
To get to it is therefore Progress sustainability selection in that the Refugee Convention must be changed.
The reason is that FRP argues that the 1951 Agreement "misused on a large scale."
The party notes that the Refugee Convention sprang from 2 World War, where the flight went to the nearest safe country:
"Sustainability Committee notes that the current situation in Europe and other western countries that asylum seekers from other parts of the world do not seek temporary protection, but permanent residency and then stay for the rest of the family through family reunification. This is effectively a form of welfare migration, which in Sustainability Commission violates the Refugee Convention's intentions. "
But Jensen admits that it is a difficult and time-consuming task of changing how the world community treats refugees.
- This must be put on the map in international forums. This is not Norway can do alone, she said.
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=no&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nrk.no%2F&sandbox=1
No comments:
Post a Comment